Regarding Superfoods in the New York Times
To Julia Moskin, Dining In section, new York Times
re: "Superfood or Monster from the Deep", September 17, 2008

I greatly appreciated your article on the strange new world of "Nutraceuticals" in last week's New York Times. With all the claims being made by most of today's food manufacturers, it gets more and more difficult to figure out what to eat, what's healthy and what's not, and what actually makes up 'FOOD" anymore. Nutritional trends come and go, often being overturned (remember when margarine, with it's loads of trans-fats, was the HEALTHY alternative?) be the new new thing.
The entire paradigm of "nutritionism" deserves intense scrutiny. Claims on a package that such and such product has oodles of Vitamin C doesn't make the product healthy. As your article points out, how the body absorbs the goodness in, say, a carrot can't be exactly replicated by inserting a bunch of beta-carotine into a muffin. "Vitamins" can't be swapped as simply as clothing accessories or car tires.
How did so many people come to think that just FOOD wasn't good enough to eat? Have people gotten to picky to maintain a healthy diet, or have food companies just perfected the art of up-selling food by adding dubious claims?
Human civilization didn't get to where it is by extracting oils from fish and inserting them into popcorn or "craisins". By and large, it seems that the further we get as a society from real FOOD, the less healthy (and more over-weight) we get.
Thanks for bringing this to your reader's attention. Hopefully people will take more time to scrutinize the claims made by the packaging in the grocery stores, and get back to eating the good stuff: FOOD.
